Tipster |
Andreas Kloft |
Twitter |
— |
Site |
BetAdvisor |
Sport |
Rugby |
Main Market/s |
England, France, Rugby Union (AH, O/U, EH) |
Bookies |
Bet365, Pinnacle, William Hill |
Nmonths |
65 |
Nmonths in green |
88% |
Premium/Free |
PREMIUM |
Npicks |
1223 |
Npicks/month avg. |
19 |
Price/month (€) |
149 |
Price/pick (€) |
7,92 |
Yield TOT |
12,95% |
Yield last 12m |
6,76% |
Yield last 6m |
31,03% |
Yield (flat stake) |
13,27% |
Profit (u) |
7582,01 |
Odds avg. |
1,9 |
Stake avg. |
47,89 |
Profit Factor |
1,3 |
K-ratio |
1,13 |
Maximum Drawdown (u) |
1199 |
E-Mail |
— |
Interview |
— |
Video-Analysis |
— |
Observations |
— |
Last update |
Dec 2017 |
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
You just cant trust this Tipster or Betadvisor .
His tip Newport Gwent Dragons +0 was a loser , but they validated it as void . Game was abandoned after 68 mins But the Dragons were losing by 12pts so Newcastle was awarded the win .,
So anyone who backed the Dragons lost their money .
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with the comments above about Betadvisor and Andreas Kloft .
Go to his profile on their website and it says 12.53% Yield for 1088 tips
So how come the Tipsters Universe say that 11.61% Yield for 1125 tips
So who is telling Lies ?, Betadvisor that’s who , 37 tips unaccounted for
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for your feed-back.
I checked it again and indeed there is a mismatch between my info and the “official” one from betadvisor. The curious issue here is that I based my analysis strictly on the information publicly provided by betadvisor.
I will review it again, and even more, I will look at this website much more in detail from now on.
Cheers
LikeLike
Thanks to you they have been caught out lovely , because no one validates their tips ,
Question now is , How many of their other tipsters have they also done this with ?
LikeLike
Anyway great job man. Thanks!
LikeLike
Good work TipstersUniverse , You need to make a Black List of Tipsters to avoid ,
That’s the one thing your website is missing .
LikeLike
Thanks for the advice. Actually, I should do it for websites (like BetAdvisor, if you finally prove they are lying), instead of tipsters, because if the website presents (deliberately or not) incorrect information of a tipster, how can we be sure that it is not being done with others within their site?
LikeLike